POLICE ETHICS & MISCONDUCT

H unmatchedst in survey and deed in both my personal and official life, I will be exemplary in obeying the rectitudes of the land and the regulations of my department.

I will never act officiously or accept personal feelings, prejudices, animosities, or friendships to influence my decisions.

I will follow out the law courteously and appropriately without fear or favor, malice or ill will, never employing unnecessary force or violence and never accepting gratuities.

I recognized the tag of my office as a symbol of public faith, and I accept it as a public trust to be held so long as I am dead on target to the ethics of the guard service.

The above ethics guidelines are practically relegated to a secondary position of importance when it comes to actual law enforcement. Well-publicized cases often make us question whether or not officers pay any attention whatsoever to the Law Enforcement commandment of Ethics. For example, a black student in New York, unarmed, was viciously gunned down by police officers who claims they thought he was attain for his gun. Another New York immigrant was sodomized by a plunger and brutally beaten while in police custody. However, these well publicized cases are

Law Enforcement Code of Ethics. hypertext transfer protocol://ci.sedalia.mo.us/spd/ethics.html, 1999, 1.

One of the biggest problems in determining the level of ethics in police work is that statistics on the matter are well-nigh impossible to come by, "There are no statistics that would allot one to compare the number of suspects who yield actually been garb up by police to the number who claim they ache been" (Impossible 1). Further, defendants who have been charged with a crime often have only their battle cry against the word of police officers when it comes to a border or fructifyed designate, "If the defense has nothing to back up the defendant's claim of a set-up, then it gets to be the police word against the defendant" (Impossible 1).

Some experts claim that police officers willingly plant evidence if they guess a suspect is guilty because they think in a way they are helping. One of the almost publicized legal cases ever, the O. J. Simpson murder trial, involved defense lawyers who claimed a bloody glove and other evidence had been planted at Simpson's home by Detective Mark Fuhrman. Evidence was never shown to prove this, but legal experts claim motive, hazard, and some evidence to infer wrongdoing are often used as measures by juries to determine misconduct by police. In the Simpson trial, Fuhrman's affectionate racial bias was used as motive. However, experts contend that Fuhrman did not have the opportunity or motive to plant a bloody glove at Simpson's estate and that, "There isn't one shred of evidence that points to anyone planting any evidence in this case, let alone Mark Fuhrman" (Mark 1). Nevertheless, jurors felt motive and opportunity had been established despite a lack of evidence and Simpson went free.

Charges of police misconduct and unethical behavior are so many and publicized of late, that even the White House has gotten involved in an effort to devise initiatives and policy recommendations for bolstering public confidence in law enforcement. President Cl
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!