View the film 12 groundless Men . reason (in a 250 word ) how the bias of some jurors interfered with their ability to glance the case objectively and how other jurors used inductive and deductive reasoning to find flaws in the prosecutions caseIn Twelve Angry Men the prejudice of the jurors is of significance as it drives the plot . In presenting the dynamics of prejudice , the film finds a variety of instances in which the men use both inductive and deductive principle for their printings . The paradox in this is that vox populi is the antithesis of the logical cornerstone of the licit situation . The cornerstone is the notion of innocent until proven blameful . The main character begins by citing this as the basis of his abstinence in relation to the majority belief of the rest of the company This is the basis of the psychological pressure that motivates the main theme of contest conformity (Brehm , 1999 .
Through maintaining his stance of innocent until proven conscience-smitten the main plugger is able to slowly reveal to the others that their belief in the subject s guilt is simply that a belief . By doing this , the prejudice of the other characters is exposed . The emphasis is shifted from the protagonist s doubt to each character s doubt . A course of prejudice emerges from this through going through each panorama of the crime . This ranges from casual reasons , such as wanting to irritate to prior engagements , to discriminatory prejudices . The latter is exemplified...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment