Interestingly, the Greek words for character and habit are around identical. Aristotle furthers this claim by comparing the possession of virtue to the phthisis of the senses. He, quite naturally, proposes that humans were given their sense before they genuinely knew how to use them. For instance, a shaver cannot see without the power of sight, which must have been inherent in the child before the child could be able to see.
Based from this theory of naturalism, Aristotle states:
So it follows, since virtue of character itself is a mean state and always touch on with entertain workforcets and pains, while vice lies in excess and deficiency, and has to do with the homogeneous things as virtue, that virtue is the state of the character which chooses the mean, relative to us in things pleasant and unpleasant (Eudemian Ethics, Book II, Chapter 10)
So, in effect, virtue is a mean state or a philia ground of sorts. The middle ground that virtue encompasses is representative of an individuals ideas of pleasure and pain and has been decided through nature to be that certain(prenominal) way. Aristotle then brings up the point of whether mans decision making skills are voluntary or involuntary or in about gray area in-between. He makes the argument that some innocuous behavior is perfectly natural but that some wrong behavior is not exhibited through the threat of punishment. He states, men will, do what they take to be both unpleasant and problematic because if they do not, then, flogging or imprisonment await them. Aristotle sums his argument...If you motive to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment