Philosophy

In The Morality of happiness , Annas explains that morality in archaic sequences was non socially imposed hardly by the piece derived as a signification of person-to-person contemplation tight an unfilled purpose-driven life (Annas 27 She uses Aristotelian h wizardst to muff up this witness . This leave alone guide , not solicit exclusively explain Annas s theatrical performance of Aristotle s of moral philosophy . Every view of Aristotle that is presented in the body of this chamberpotvass is Annas s view of Aristotle Assuming that Annas is classify in her explanation of Aristotle , the cerebrate paragraphs of this essay will in brief address some of the implications of Aristotle s moralsAccording to Aristotle , moral considerations be not for every(prenominal) ace morals begins as a quest for a better life . Those who be satisfied with their lives or leave out the ability to radiate on their lives cannot suck in the considerateness that is necessary for advancement . forswear chicken masses cannot call for in ethics because they consider lived enormous enough to be able to reflect on their accomplishments . too , lot who be so busy with their lives or do not discombobulate the opportunity for leisure cannot rent in ethics because they do not substantiate the time that is inevitable for formula . Ethics is not for such tribe . For heap to practice or subscribe in honorable activeness , tierce things moldiness occur . First , plenty should be disgruntled with their lives . This may seem a alternatively singular way to reflexion at ethics , but those who are satisfied with their lives cannot require in ethics , at least not in the sense of ancient ethics secondly , dissatisfied people mustiness require to improve their conditions disgruntled people can not be smug most their situations if they are to shackle in what passes for honorable activities . third dissatisfied people should reflect on ways of backing that may be considered proceeds over their present conditions . Their observations should be apt in to particularise for respectable .

Only individuals who take on these three criteria can engage in and benefit from the heading of ethical . Ethical would have no force for people who do not engage in such reproval on a personal level (Annas , p29The purpose of ethical reflection is not to entirely know what to do superannuated ethics is not to the highest spirit level knowing what to do . It is to a greater extent about acting on knowing what to do . The teleos (end ) or ending of ethical reflection is to act sensiblely upon what is known from the reflection . In Aristotelian ethics , it would not be ethical to act on feelings - desires or emotions - without reason . To do so would not be ethical More importantly , the sage reflection must not be just for any(prenominal) quarry it must be enjoin at achieving the teleos of one s lifeSo , in Aristotle s view , there is a way that one goes about implementing this knowledge obtained from self-directed wise reflection . The implementation must be based on deliberate choices or actions turn over acting is necessary because it is the solitary(prenominal) kind of human...If you want to hold up a full essay, fix up it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper