Anti-Nepotism and the Loss of Privacy :: Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Anti-Nepotism and the Loss of PrivacyIntroductionWhen employees bring their private problems to work and it affects their performance or the performance of others, clearly you can coach, counsel, warn, and at last terminate their employment. In cases where employees did not cause a problem at work but were fired merely because of an anti-nepotism policy, courts in some states nominate the employees had been discriminated against on the basis of marital term. Such policies penalize employees who are marry, as compared to unmarried employees whose relationships are equally intimate. Currently, thirty-eight (38) states prohibit marital berth discrimination. Having a more general policy prohibiting employees who co-habit from working in the said(prenominal) area would not violate marital status legal philosophys, but could be considered an invasion of common law privacy, which is recognized in most states (Risser 1997). In my paper, I will address the issue of anti-nepotism, and invasion of common law privacy. What business is it of the organization if people co-habit? How are employers supposed to know who is surviving together? The prohibition against invasion of privacy by the government is enforced, and anti-nepotism policies seem to supercede even those more strictly. Anti-Nepotism What is Nepotism? Nepotism comes about whenever an employee makes decisions affecting a skinny relative or house servant partner. Included in these decisions are those that adjoin to hiring, appointment, reappointment, classification, reclassification, evaluation, promotion, transfer, discipline, supervision, or pay increases. According to the King County Board of Ethics, nepotism is a contravention of interest based on familial relationship or domestic partnership, and is at variance(p) with the basic principles of ethics (Edwards 1998). The practice of nepotism is said to be inconsistent in instances that require impartial decision-making and attempts to ensure that private interest or personal benefit does not override the publics interest. In addition, nepotism creates situations that appear of improper influence or favor. As such, anti-nepotism policies have been write to protect public organizations from adverse lawsuits. There are many jaundiced clauses of anti-nepotism policies, as they pertain to individual lifestyle and privacy.Although an anti-nepotism policy does not expressly discriminate against an applicant based on the condition of being married or unmarried, it may exclude a person because of the particular personal identity of his or her spouse. Whether spousal identity as opposed to marital status per se is a prohibited basis for discrimination is an unanswered promontory under many discrimination laws