The Microsoft Antitrust Case Essay -- essays research papers fc

The compositors case against Microsoft was brought buy the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as several state Attorneys General. Microsoft is charge of using and maintaining monopoly power to gain an unsporting advantage in the market. The case has been under observation for a long time, hardly the Justice division is having trouble coming up with substantial evidence against Microsoft. Specifically, the Department must(prenominal) proveThat Microsoft has monopoly power and is using it to gain unfair leverage in the market.And that Microsoft has maintained this monopoly power through "exclusionary" or "predatory" acts(Rule).Some say that Microsoft is unaccompanied taking advantage of its position in the market and using advance(a) marketing strategies to attract new customers. They possess chosen to implement a market development strategy to attract new customers who are spirit for a system that has Internet capability. Microsoft feels that by integratin g their Internet adventurer web browser technology into Windows, they are entirely improving its general functionality available to the customer. Microsoft began expanding into the browser area because of increasing threat from Netscape and umber. Java is the scheduling language used to make Netscape. Programs that are written in Java can work on any PC, whether it has Windows on it or not. That is wherefore there is a great threat to the Windows environment. The more Netscape is used, the more different vendors volition begin writing Netscape compliant programs and the more Java leave be used, which puts a damper on Windows. So Windows introduced their Internet explorer to combat the increasing Netscape usage. It did not do this to create a monopoly, but to protect itself. If people realize that Java programs can be brave on ANY PC, then they will realize that they do not need to buy Windows. Some say that Microsoft began its "illegal" docket when it began requir ing PC manufacturers to sign a license agreement that said that if they were going to have Windows preinstalled on their new systems, that the Windows Internet Explorer must also be installed. Although it is possible for consumers to install early(a) browsers onto Windows and use them, critics say that Microsoft still has an unfair advantage. It also keeps other browser companies from being able to consult with PC manufacturers to put their browser on the PC from the beginn... ...nies, server companies, and just close any other company that has something to do with a computer. Microsoft knows that it has the dominant operate system on the market right now and every software program company, ISP, etc, wants to be part of it. If they are not, then they are likely to go under. The more and more companies that join Microsoft, the more and more Microsofts monopoly power will grow. Pretty soon, Microsoft will own 100% of the market not only in browsers, but I believe in many other ar eas, such as software production and distribution and even what broad of computer, its hardware, etc, that can run Windows. I do not believe that Microsofts monopoly agenda solely contains their "browser war", but that it extends to a much higher(prenominal) scale. Works CitedWeb Sites<a href="http//www.mindspring.com/dmataconis/microsoft.htmCase Resources">http//www.mindspring.com/dmataconis/microsoft.htmCase Resources<a href="http//www.mindspring.com/dmataconis/sherman.txt">http//www.mindspring.com/dmataconis/sherman.txt<a href="http//www.cnn.com/US/9805/18/federal.complaint/">http//www.cnn.com/US/9805/18/federal.complaint/