What is Truth - Comparison of Plato and Peirces Philosophy :: essays research papers

What is Truth?For thousands of years, mankind has persistently act truth, knowledge, and understanding. For most, this pursuit is a driving force which usually doesnt destroy until one(a) finds a truth that is satisfying to him or her. Even then, however, one may choose to look for an alternate truth that may be even more satisfying to them. This pursuit does not always quest for the same path for everyone as there are different ideas as to how truth is actually obtained and which is the beat out way to obtain it. Two individuals and long philosophers of their time, Plato and Charles Peirce, each had their own ideas on how truth and knowledge could be obtained. ace of the main differences between Platos and Peirces philosophies regarding truth is that Plato believed truth is founded in knowledge while Peirce believed knowledge could never be obtained. Plato believed that everyone possesses knowledge and the recognition of this knowledge could be achieved through recollection. This was demonstrated in Platos Meno when Socrates presented the straightforward of double size question to the buckle down boy. Socrates did not teach the slave boy how to get the answer, he merely asked the boy a serial of questions and the boy came to the right answer through recollection. In this way, the boy already possessed the knowledge to answer the question correctly. With this philosophy, truth is past-oriented. Past experiences and ordinary knowledge is the key to truth.Plato also had the philosophy of dyadic intuitionism. Intuition, Plato believed, is the basis of knowledge. tenacious progressions need not be made to determine relationships and discover truth. Plato was nearer to the side of the Realm of Being as opposed to the Realm of befitting. The Realm of Being is eternal, involves recollection and acquisition of knowledge, and consists of a more cheerful view of truth.Peirce, on the other hand, believed that true knowledge could never be obtained. He beli eved that truth was future oriented. Peirces preferred method of prosecute truth was the scientific method. This method consists of forming a hypothesis and trying to overthrow the hypothesis through practical evidence. Although Peirce thought the scientific method was the best approach to search for truth, he believed that it could only be used to disprove a hypothesis, and that nothing could be proven for certain. It is through this idea that his look that knowledge can never be obtained is founded.