Revenge in “Medea”, by Euripides, and “The House of the Spirits” by Isabel Allende

Often, when someone commits evil deeds, it causes the victim to take action. This, however, may just escalate the situation to the point where the characters forget about morals and beliefs for retribution. In the novel, The House of the Spirits, by Isabel Allende, and the play, Medea, by Euripides, the characters from two works react intensely to get punish on others.Although Allende mainly uses effective diction, and Euripides the power of the emit, both authors ch all toldenge the view that when face up with damage, defiance is the solution. In The House of the Spirits, Allendes use of diction enhances the injustice that Esteban Garcia ll must confront, but also to express the consequences of such(prenominal)(prenominal) confrontation. To begin, he loathes Esteban Trueba for raping his grandmother, Pancha, the cause for his revenge.During the death of Pedro Garcia, Allende details Esteban Garcias evil for Esteban Trueba he hated Esteban Trueba Trueba had forgotten all ab out Pancha Garcia and the fact that he had had a child with her Esteban Garcia would lie awake at night imagining all sorts of odious illnesses and accidents that could put an end to the life of Esteban Trueba Esteban Garcia always reproached Trueba for the dark existence he had forged for him, and he felt constantly punished (Allende, 189). Evidently, Esteban Garcia has passionate disdain for his grandfather, rooted by the transgression he commits by raping Garcias grandmother.Allende underlines his aversion by using harsh diction, such as dreadful, reproached, dark, forged, and punished. This depicts the extent to which Garcia regards such actions as injustice. Later in the novel, the consequences of getting revenge on Esteban Trueba are noniceed. As Alba writes about her family history with Esteban Trueba, she discusses, Alba wrote in her mind that one twenty-four hour period Colonel Garcia would stand before her in defeat and that she would avenge herself on all those wh o need to be avenged.But now she has begun to question her testify hatred Afterward the grandson of the woman who was raped repeats the gesture with the granddaughter of the rapist, and perhaps forty age from now Albas grandson allow knock Garcias granddaughter down among the rushes, and so on by means of the centuries in an unending tale of sorrow, blood, and love (431-432). Allende explores the inevitability of retribution, that revenge will always take place because the two families would continue to intoxicate injustice in the way their ancestors deal with situations.Effective diction is employ to intensify the readers scents about this, such as repeats, so on through the centuries, and unending, which enhances the feeling of continuity, and in that locationfore negativity, in the consequences. She also uses gloomy words, like sorrow and blood to deliver the message that such consequences are also gloomy and unfavour suitable. To summarize, Allende indicates that revenge should not be taken as a result of injustice, through the manipulation of diction. Similarly, in Medea, Euripides illustrates that injustice is not necessarily resolved when the victim seeks vengeance.However, he uses the ability to pass directly to his audience, instead of elaborate words with dense meanings. The use of the chorus, on with rhetorical questions, aids Euripides in conveying his message to his audience. Euripides uses the chorus to emphasize the difficulties that Medea must cope with, but also to emphasize the immorality in the way she chooses to resolve the situation. To begin, the chorus is used to depict the injustice that Medea is faced with. When Creon banishes Medea from the city of Corinth, the chorus sympathizes for Medea by saying, hapless womanOverwhelmed by sorrow Where will you turn? What stranger will afford you hospitality? (Euripides, 45. 359-360). Clearly, the chorus is feeling sympathy toward Medea, as they exclaim her feelings and worry about h er future. In the superannuated Greek setting of this play, the audience would confirm what their feelings toward the play should be through the chorus. This would therefore cause the audience to feel sympathy for Medea as well, and Euripides would obey in making the audience realize the injustice that Medea faces.The use of the two rhetorical questions also emphasizes this feeling. If the all-knowing chorus cigaretnot even perform these questions, there must not be any answer, and Medea must really curb nowhere to go. Further into the play, however, the choruss opinion on Medea changes when she reveals her temporary hookup to get revenge on Jason for causing her misery. When she announces her intention of killing Jasons new family, the chorus asks. Whence you got the hardihood to conceive such a plan? And in the horrible act, as you bring death on your own children, how will you steel your heart and hand?When you cast your eyeball on them, your own children, will you not wee p that you should be their murderess? (58. 843-847). Suddenly, the chorus is against Medea, and the audience would follow this dramatic turn. Through the use of rhetoric, Euripides shows that any shrewd person should not plan as such, should not be able to steel themselves, and should not be able to murder her own children without weeping. As Medea begins lose her ability to think ethically, Euripides demonstrates Medeas immorality because she descends too deep in the choices she cooks to resolve her problems.The rhetorical style enables the audience to be employed and actually think about the situation as they try to answer the question. This is in contrast to the way Allende shows the irrational decisions people tend to make in their attempts to confront injustice. Allende uses elaborate diction that effectively portrays the negativity in both situations, whereas Eurpides has the option to engage his audience directly. However, both authors, despite having their own methods, s ucceed in proving that defiance tends to go out of control, when it either lasts infinitely causes the characters to forget how to act morally.In conclusion, both Allende and Euripides take different routes to reveal their underlying purpose that seeking revenge is not necessarily the constitute path to take when faced with injustice. The phrase two wrongs do not make a right has a powerful effect in both works, as it causes permanent retaliations of wrongs and results in the disregard for ethics and morals. Overall, it can be seen that people tend to reciprocate injustice due to their craving for retribution.